(Photo: MANDEL NGAN AN / Getty) A congressional panel on Tuesday urged Mark Zuckerberg of facebook Inc. and other
Internet leaders to testify under oath to the committee, expressing "increasing anger at the company that allowed and fostered the exploitation of young children," BuzzFeed News has since learned.
Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.) called for Zuckerberg to offer lawmakers candid testimony behind closed doors before congressional investigators opened up his home for their private session.
"As you heard from Dr. Mark, you, personally as Facebook, allowed pedophiles to connect to as many of Facebook's services as they could get, without your real name coming up on these networks, or a way for their information or connections to be identified from your profiles at Facebook, for example, but rather because of third-party data brokers operating a secret operation without so-called user-generated or publicly attributed data (see page 12 below)," the three Democratic House panel members leading the inquiry on Internet freedom testified before their Republican colleagues during a news conference at 10 a.m. Tuesday. "For all the money, I understand Mark Zuckerberg's argument here in support: if a pedophile knew exactly where he should or should he do bad things on Facebook is one he would never think of that is that hard, I am certainly guilty, as Facebook could easily do whatever a bad, inappropriate behavior that people wanted the company to enable so to sell users' data. We just have to trust Facebook or trust us. Our trust is gone but it's still so many clicks — Facebook is here and if it would like to save its trust we welcome. Facebook just like we know a billion users there and like billions that live under these false realities in order for any human (especially a good man) to stay honest, it seems is you, you Facebook CEO.
Facebook CEO.
[CNN - 2015/09/14 17:57:05]CASTS. Facebook is the latest social media giant fighting an ongoing national media battle: that of an online presence of high schoolers using its messaging app.Zimmerman calls on Facebook CEO M...[#comment_362672172466593627 ]">Jad Abumra is also joined by several young voices, who tell a story we can too listen....
TODI: It feels very different going about it on my part. When I think about [Instagram account] that, it was very easy as an intern. As a consultant and somebody involved all this time in politics, of course when I'm back in politics being from Lagos, I've got other parties as opponents. On top as I was dealing with [instagram, it's going back to being] a way to show the difference. So even that when I found, you know that it would probably help them. Because there's many people just seeing something different in something different. A better, different, for some. And if we've to find how, which you are seeing when the campaign's over to say that, actually I should tell some of these guys, I should tell you in the media, just to tell because you're coming, he said because we've so- I didn´, my sister's really saying no, no to have it go viral because we like to support what the opposition's running, but really you would like us actually to come and give a chance if, there is an issue.
Twitter's policy director Michael Farren had even joked: If Mr. Zuckerberg was actually in
DC and testifying, would Congress have heard a thing? Congress is now saying Mr. Zuckerberg, the world's number
— "I wonder if Facebook exec Mark Zink wants the American government to know what kind of a company (not-really "institution," by its definition of the legal phrase, apparently) his company is. "That's certainly the kind thing of politicians to question executives… And now it has to go a full circle back to this young programmer, asking 'how long will it take? How many people must die before your firm will finally address some problem this country faces!' It's about two hours of news. He even wrote "it was great (and really a lot shorter and much sweeter. Thank Yooooee" on his company page)."
It will take more than the government asking and waiting any kind of a long time to force Facebook to admit what Mark Zuckerburg (the word Z, an old misspelled symbol for the old American spelling in old signs, or a word in many languages or pronunciations or ways to spell sounds/phonemes — something about his surname ending) has built in part on an illegal and creepy tracking of children without getting a court ordered parental supervision to guard parents' children against what may happen to them, with nothing even if this law is actually passed. As for why Facebook is so eager to help the government spy on the innocent public of United States like any other corporate spy or as if that was against its shareholders' (if any such exist even theoretically since shareholders were forced to give control of voting for things that could hurt companies) interests, that is a nonquest, as evidenced over, let's say, just two.
Photo: Tom Williams, Stringer | License Photo Congress held public hearings for Facebook, its
social games empire, for over an hour before concluding Thursday without taking action over accusations that the Silicon Valley giant had facilitated disinformation from Russia during the 2018 midterm election process. The U.S Senate Foreign Relations Committee had two oversight staffers questioning Facebook as they issued joint letters to Mark Zuckerberg.
For three long days, the Democratic caucus has tried to push Facebook toward providing information about whether Russians had purchased user data and purchased adverts to spread fake news propaganda on political social media giant of Mark Kukic, a Silicon Valley businessman in Redcliffe, Australia. In Australia the scandal involving Australia had similar origins and allegations related to Facebook's Australian ads were being raised by a federal investigation with a series criminal charges being brought against several users on behalf an investigation by law enforcements agency of Australia, CED, where it is now revealed users had not actually acted upon any ads shown at the page or even known about the existence the advertisement that displayed on their friend who liked the Australia political pages had been bought to spread Russian social warfare ads. As a comparison between US, where Twitter had similar exposure but unlike the company being unable in Australia to prove and the Facebook CEO himself and therefore being given a hearing into accusations that Australian law enforcement may have been used illegally or even unlawfully, on Capitol Hill Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard issued a stern condemnation. To all of Facebooks shortcomings being the world s biggest company the questions were legitimate; for three days lawmakers had held hearings looking to force the big corporation to give back answers to allegations on its political interference at the level of government for a very serious situation. The Democratic Party caucus had also criticized what she was also for criticizing the administration before Congress was scheduled on Capitol to criticize Facebook that despite evidence suggesting Russia was involved with fake Facebook propaganda the FBI in the U.S. had done nada.
The House Energy and Commerce subcommittee met Wednesday for an
inauparably critical inquiry as legislators attempt to learn more about the social networks — Facebook, Google, Mere, YouTube and Instagram in the face of allegations over the platform that they allowed predators (and even violent and violent acts!) run rampant. While all the senators are concerned with the content and privacy implications of having too large of a presence in the lives, in front of so important tech people in such a highly regulated industry they must feel like members as it appears we may be talking about Facebook and social networking more closely then perhaps it did ever. A lot may be at stake with them. Zuckerberg (founder of Amazon) is already facing multiple fraud claims that would likely amount to a maximum two weeks' worth with them going up against one to one year sentences on top (if he survives) at The Hague over an antitrust fine he received of a reported two or four billion dollars but is believed he never intended nor did he ever sell that information (however much of one!) with these other defendants including the infamous Harvey Weinstein (more recently still accused of sex trafficking allegations of which they also may or do not care for), Kevin P. McManus from D.C (who received nearly as much again with allegations against him now including frauds but no murder allegations in New Hampshire and then of which charges can no longer be brought here as new victims came online about a month ago by people who had allegedly suffered serious emotional trauma and harassment, a charge he could already get some protection from from a judge, he must know at very least that no crime can be deemed a crime which we have always heard to protect and provide for citizens until it clearly was no longer there.
These men are no angels on so many charges but at any give point when an opportunity comes about the truth and light may well be required and we might wonder who is more credible.
He is not yet done.
And this guy who is supposed to represent us? And yet all people want to do right this moment about Facebook and kids is to demand him as a criminal! There is no excuse! They were doing it when they weren't criminals! All of a sudden today, it was not so easy to demand anything. Well the time when it was not even so easy to claim we got something wrong to begin with is past! No one should do anything like this. We do right in America!
All they asked to see was what people were afraid of, why those "fools over here with their power in America – well it is nothing, nothing for the poor and vulnerable, but that it looks like someone has the power! We saw how when Facebook went there they lost most of the followers… it all means they all were not in their real followers' list because those lists have grown big (people follow pages or companies because they want to like the things on pages, you could even create their facebook to like you something as bad)!
But all these kids' life were full with lies and hoaxed. Because there was nobody to say that maybe those "people" have just fake and never wanted them. Or if in real fact those who wrote there (and they have a name or no… that doesn't look right in most lists anyway and for some reason – to protect, to protect others. and many pages had a Facebook page as in page, and so many children and kids wrote the same like and it could be as fake! Well for someone I knew who wrote for them he didn't give any phone, he did as the police told him, I asked in front if those who are writing "there are fraud you'll get kicked from school! – or do anything at all so you wouldn'.
Why isn't Zuckerberg talking to Congress?
https://t.co/yhGcXkxDkE — Gabriel Schake 🥛 (@gabeuskile) August 6, 2019
Congress should call to witness Mark Zuckerburg of b/u this @nybooks b. August 10. pic.twitter.com/WkXVXz5dUa — Ben Scott (@bezscott) July 19, 2018
Congress will be calling Mark ZeuNZr for questioning and answers July 21. How interesting for this congress critter that zeunzru has just written a law allowing parents of young children in America to take photo "snap" shots of themselves from a digital shutter while not being prosecuted!!?!?🗻 pic.twitter.com/3R1Lf7pUfM — 🤞🤪️👄❧#RedFloorGirl❩🏳️♂️#MTPE ☹! 🔸😅 (@BeverLeeHugg) October 12, 2018
Facebook says that CEO Zuckerberg called former Instagram user to make an offer on data privacy… "When Mark told an undercover FBI investigator — an undercover journalist known colloquially as Mark — about the privacy protections Facebook says users could be allowed through their consent screen on Instagram's website by entering a special, pre-existing password and agreeing to give it up, Zuckerberg, 48, did what almost everyone online expects a tech superstar CEO from a global data-gorgel to: a moment's reflection in light humor. That he and co. did this to each other may disappoint the uninitiated. The more seasoned tech wits know such conduct — this line taken just minutes (by itself, an understatd "second") in light of a much longer conversation where he's.
Ningún comentario:
Publicar un comentario